Introduction to Professional Management
|
Meets: Gray Wolf Hall 364, CRN 13507 (variable days and times; see course schedule for details)
Instructors: Associate Professor Craig Dunn
Office: PH 206a
Office Hours: Fridays/Saturdays by appointment
Phone: 360-650-2593 (office/voicemail)
E-mail: craig.dunn@wwu.edu
URL: www.dunn.cc
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
MBA 594 -- INTRODUCTION TO PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT (4) Prereq: admission to the MBA program. Explores the responsibilities and tasks of management, the characteristics of successful managers, various contexts of management, elements of strategic decision making at various levels of the organization, and an introduction to global business issues.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
As a result of successfully completing this course, students will:
OBJECTIVE OR OUTCOME ASSESSMENT INDEX or MEASURE o Have an understanding of your own personal attributes and skills including values and ethics and how these relate to managerial success. Reflective journal
Writing Assignments
o Have a working knowledge of the relationships and responsibilities business has to stakeholder groups Participation
Reflective journal
Writing Assignments
Case study
o Be able to define ethics and explain how ethics relates to business behavior Reflective journal
Writing Assignments
Case studyo Describe and apply several important ethical theories Participation
Reflective journal
Writing Assignments
Case study
EVALUATION POLICY:
A maximum of 100 points may be accumulated in this course. Point distribution varies as follows (see grading contract at back of syllabus for details):
o Writing Assignments | 20-40 points |
o Reflective Journal | 20-40 points |
o Group Case Analysis | 20-40 points |
GRADING STANDARDS:
The following grading standards will be used to determine your final course grade. Students are responsible for monitoring their own progress throughout the term.
93 - 100 points
A |
90 - 92.9 points
A- |
86.5 - 89.9 points
B+ |
83 - 86.4 points
B |
80 - 82.9 points
B- |
76.5 - 79.9 points
C+ |
73 - 76.4 points
C |
70 - 72.9 points
C- |
66.5 - 69.9 points
D+ |
63 - 66.4 points
D |
60 - 62.9 points
D- |
|||||||||||
PLAGIARISM:
In a section entitled Grades and Intellectual Honesty, the Western Washington University catalog states:
Grades are given for the student’s work and achievement. Fair evaluation of students’ work and helpful instruction are possible only when students submit work which genuinely reflects their own reading, computation, research and thoughts and is their own production, whether in writing or other format(s). Intellectual dishonesty can result in a failing grade and the placement of a note in the student’s permanent record. For the university’s policy on academic dishonesty, see Appendix D.
Students involved in any form of academic dishonesty (including but not limited to plagiarism or `cheating') on any coursework will receive a failing grade for the course.
READINGS:
Handy, C. (1998) The Hungry Spirit: Beyond Capitalism: A Quest for Purpose in the Modern World (Broadway Books). Additionally, assigned case studies, reading materials, podcasts, and course videos will be available on the course schedule. Students are expected to read each assigned reading before the scheduled discussion that reading, and to come prepared to respond to the disucssion questions posted for each class session.
WRITING ASSIGNMENTS:
There will be four writing assignments throughout the term (see course schedule for due dates). All assignments relate directly to the course content, either as presented in class and/or as covered in assigned readings. Each paper will take the form of a two to three-page, double-spaced, typed paper which directly addresses the question(s) posed. While it is certainly allowable for students to discuss these writing assignments with one another, final papers ought to be recognizable as the 'independent' work of the student submitting the writing assignment.
Papers are to be submitted electronically to craig.dunn@wwu.edu. The e-mail memo line as well as the MS Word file name MUST begin with the LAST NAME of the student and also include the course designation (MBA 594). Evaluation criteria for these assignments include:
o evidence of self-awareness |
o adequacy of analysis |
o coherence of argument |
o practical/prescriptive merit |
o overall professionalism |
REFLECTIVE JOURNAL:
Each day the class schedule will indicate a 'prompt' for your reflective journal (see course schedule for due dates). This term-long assignment accounts for twenty to thirty percent of your course grade, and is designed to engage you in linking the course content with 'real life' application.
To post a journal entry, students are to 'cut and paste' the 'prompt' from the course schedule into a new thread within their own journal, and then provide their reflections on the 'prompt.' The reflective journal is to be kept in Blackboard. To post an entry, do the following:
o Click on the 'journal' button in the left menu bar o Click on 'view' o Click on 'new entry' o Enter a BRIEF journal entry title o Cut and paste the 'prompt' from the course schedule into the BODY of the journal entry o Click 'save' (following completion of journal entry)
Each student has access to only their own journal. Only each individual student, as well as the faculty members, have access to these posts which are time and date stamped upon submission. Entries are due by midnight of each day a 'prompt' is listed on the course schedule.
GROUP CASE ANALYSIS:
Each student shall participate in a team-based case analysis , with the primary objective being to link theory and practice. Each three-four member team is to prepare both a comprehensive written analysis as well as a formal class presentation of a business case. This analysis is to include: (1) a statement identifying the case issue(s); (2) listing of alternatives providing resolution of these case issues; (3) analysis of proposed resolutions from the perspective of managerial as well as ethical theory; (4) assessment of both the financial as well as the political viability of the recommended alternative; (5) selection of optimal resolution (with supporting defense from both the managerial and ethical perspectives); as well as (6) suggestions for implementation. Any assumptions made must be clearly identified as such, but do not 'assume away' the issues resolve them!
A 'Case Proposal' form is to be submitted by each group no later than the end of the second week of the course. Cases can come from any appropriate current source; the Wall Street Journal and the 'Social Issues' column of Business Week are among the more popular periodicals for sourcing timely business cases. Cases are to be presented during the class session set aside for case presentation (see course schedule for specific date).
Reporting will take the form of a 30 minute oral presentation followed by a 20 minute question and answer session. Be creative. Prepare the analysis as if you were presenting the information to any fitting audience you explicitly identify, to be role-played by those students not in your group (who will be accountable for posing relevant questions to the presenting group).
Areas considered (in addition to those previously or subsequently mentioned) in grading the team project are listed in the table below.
o accuracy of issue identification |
o clarity and conciseness of arguments |
o use of theory to support recommendation(s) |
o soundness of recommendation(s) |
o feasibilty of recommendation(s) |
o professionalism of case presentation |
o creativity of approach |
o ability to engage the class in discussion |
MIDTERM AND FINAL EXAMINATIONS:
There are no examinations for this course.
CONTRACT:
Outlined above are the course activities available to students. Ranges of possible points have been listed above. Each student is to fill out and return to the instructor a binding contract for work to be completed this term (see below). You are to fill out the number of points desired for each activity. The total number of points must total 100. Points for each activity will range from 20-40% of the course grade, depending upon the individual assignment and weightings. Points must be selected in increments of 5.
For example, a student may choose to minimize the points on the group case analysis by completing all other assignments at the maximum points possible:
o Writing Assignments | 40 points |
o Reflective Journal | 40 points |
o Group Case Analysis | 20 points |
In all cases, class participation is mandatory. Failure to attend scheduled class sessions may be reflected in final course grading.
To send your MBA 594 contract, fill out the following form thoroughly and completely. This form must be submitted electronically. A confirmed copy of each contract will be posted to Blackboard by the end of the first week of class.