Introduction to Professional Management
Meets: Everett University Center #256, CRN 13609 (variable days and times; see course schedule for details)
Instructor: Professor Craig Dunn
Office: PH 317
Office Hours: by appointment
Phone: 360-650-2593 (office/voicemail)
Canvas Site link: https://wwu.instructure.com/courses/1338816
MBA 594 -- INTRODUCTION TO PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT (4) Prereq: admission to the MBA program. Explores the responsibilities and tasks of management, the characteristics of successful managers, various contexts of management, elements of strategic decision making at various levels of the organization, and an introduction to global business issues.
As a result of successfully completing this course, students will:
OBJECTIVE OR OUTCOME ASSESSMENT INDEX or MEASURE
o Validate mastery of discipline-specific business knowledge and analytical skills.
o Illustrate ability to apply critical thinking and ethical decision making to complex business problems. Participation
o Be conscientious in the application of business knowledge.
o Create an orientation of personal responsibility, respect and professionalism. Participation
This is an intensive class, with active participation being critical to both your learning as well as success of the course. Be prepared to speak up and be involved. You are encouraged to work with and discuss class activities with other students; however, written papers are to be recognizable as your own work. If these assumptions, objectives and tentative plans do not fit our situation, we will modify them as we work together. The faculty member reserves the right to adjust and/or amend the course outline as necessary to maximize student learning. If such changes are made, they will be posted on the course web page. Ask questions, raise issues, express concerns; our best discussions often evolve from trying to figure out how to skillfully handle difficult management situations.
A maximum of 100 points may be accumulated in this course. Point distribution varies as follows (see grading contract at end of syllabus for details):
|o Writing Assignments||20-40 points|
|o Reflective Journal||20-40 points|
|o Group Case Analysis||20-40 points|
The following grading standards will be used to determine your final course grade. Students are responsible for monitoring their own progress throughout the term.
|93.35 - 100 points
|90 - 93.34 points
|86.65 - 89.99 points
|83.35 - 86.65 points
|80 - 83.34 points
|76.65 - 79.99 points
|73.35 - 76.64 points
|70 - 73.34 points
In a section entitled Grades and Intellectual Honesty, the Western Washington University catalog states:
Grades are given for the student’s work and achievement. Fair evaluation of students’ work and helpful instruction are possible only when students submit work which genuinely reflects their own reading, computation, research and thoughts and is their own production, whether in writing or other format(s). Intellectual dishonesty can result in a failing grade and the placement of a note in the student’s permanent record. For the university’s policy on academic dishonesty, see Appendix D.
Students involved in any form of academic dishonesty (including but not limited to plagiarism or `cheating') on any coursework will receive a failing grade for the course.
Assigned case studies, reading materials, podcasts, and course videos will be available on the course schedule. Students are expected to read each assigned reading before the scheduled discussion that reading, and to come prepared to respond to the disucssion questions posted for each class session.
There will be four writing assignments throughout the term (see course schedule for due dates). All assignments relate directly to the course content, either as presented in class and/or as covered in assigned readings. Each paper will take the form of a two-page, double-spaced, typed paper which directly addresses the question(s) posed. While it is certainly allowable for students to discuss these writing assignments with one another, final papers ought to be recognizable as the 'independent' work of the student submitting the writing assignment.
Papers are to be submitted electronically through the Canvas Learning Management System (LMS), as a word document or a .pdf.
To post an entry, do the following:
o Login to https://wwu.instructure.com/courses/1338816 o Click on 'Assignments' tab in the left menu bar o Click on relevant Reflective Writing Assignment# o Read and respond to the Writing Assignment prompt o Click on 'Submit Assignment' (option for file upload, .doc or .docx) o Click on 'Submit Assignment' when done
Entries are due by midnight of the day on which a 'prompt' is listed on the course schedule. Evaluation criteria for these assignments include:
|o evidence of self-awareness|
|o adequacy of analysis|
|o coherence of argument|
|o practical/prescriptive merit|
|o overall professionalism|
Each assignment should conclude with identification of both the MBA Program Goal(s) and MBA Learning Objective(s) that are addressed by the writing assignment.
The course schedule (see course schedule for due dates) indicates a 'prompt' for reflective journal entries for a variety of weeks throughout the term. There will be six reflective journal 'prompts' throughout the term; each student is to submit five reflective journal assignments. This term-long activity accounts for twenty to forty percent of your course grade, and is designed to engage you in linking the course content with 'real life' application(s).
To post a journal entry, students are to 'cut and paste' the 'prompt' from the course schedule into a new thread within their own journal, and then provide their reflections on the 'prompt.' The reflective journal is to be kept in Canvas. To post an entry, do the following:
o Login to https://wwu.instructure.com/courses/1338816 o Click on 'Assignments' tab in the left menu bar o Click on relevant Reflective Journal # o Read and respond to the Reflective Journal prompt o Click on 'Submit Assignment' (options for text entry or file upload) o Click on 'Submit Assignment' when done
Each student has access to only their own journal. Only each individual student, as well as the faculty member, have access to these posts which are time and date stamped upon submission. Entries are due by midnight of the day on which a 'prompt' is listed on the course schedule.
Each assignment should conclude with identification of both the MBA Program Goal(s) and MBA Learning Objective(s) that are addressed by the reflective journal entry.
GROUP CASE ANALYSIS:
Each student shall participate in a team-based case analysis , with the primary objective being to link theory and practice. Each two-member to three-member team is to prepare both a comprehensive written analysis as well as a formal class presentation of a business case. This analysis is to include: (1) a statement identifying the case issue(s); (2) listing of alternatives providing resolution of these case issues; (3) analysis of proposed resolutions from the perspective of managerial as well as ethical theory; (4) assessment of both the financial as well as the political viability of the recommended alternative; (5) selection of optimal resolution (with supporting defense from both the managerial and ethical perspectives); as well as (6) suggestions for implementation. Any assumptions made must be clearly identified as such, but do not 'assume away' the issues resolve them!
A 'Case Proposal' form is to be submitted by each group no later than the end of the fourth week of the course. Cases can come from any appropriate current source; the Wall Street Journal and the 'Social Issues' column of Business Week are among the more popular periodicals for sourcing timely business cases. Cases are to be presented during the class sessions set aside for case presentation (see course schedule for specific dates).
Reporting will take the form of a 20 minute oral presentation followed by a 20 minute question and answer session. Be creative. Prepare the analysis as if you were presenting the information to any fitting audience you explicitly identify, to be role-played by those students not in your group (who will be accountable for posing relevant questions to the presenting group).
Areas considered (in addition to those previously or subsequently mentioned) in grading the team project are listed in the table below.
|o accuracy of issue identification|
|o clarity and conciseness of arguments|
|o use of theory to support recommendation(s)|
|o soundness of recommendation(s)|
|o feasibilty of recommendation(s)|
|o professionalism of case presentation|
|o creativity of approach|
|o ability to engage the class in discussion|
MIDTERM AND FINAL EXAMINATIONS:
There are no examinations for this course.
Outlined above are the course activities available to students. Ranges of possible points have been listed above. Each student is to fill out and return to the instructor a binding contract for work to be completed this term (see below). You are to fill out the number of points desired for each activity. The total number of points must total 100. Points for each activity will range from 20-40% of the course grade, depending upon the individual assignment and weightings. Points must be selected in increments of 5.
For example, a student may choose to minimize the points on the group case analysis by completing all other assignments at the maximum points possible:
|o Writing Assignments||40 points|
|o Reflective Journal||40 points|
|o Group Case Analysis||20 points|
In all cases, class participation is mandatory. Failure to attend scheduled class sessions may be reflected in final course grading.
To send your MBA 594 contract, fill out the following form thoroughly and completely. This form must be submitted electronically. A confirmed copy of each contract will be provided to each student by return e-mail.